An Investigation of the Threshold Hypothesis Using ASIS Intelligence Scale and Creative Imagination Cards

Authors

  • Gözde Yılmaz Anadolu University, Faculty of Education, Eskisehir, Turkey
  • M. Bahadır Ayas Center for Research and Practice for High ability Education (EPTS), Anadolu University, Faculty of Education, Eskisehir, Turkey
  • Uğur Sak Center for Research and Practice for High ability Education (EPTS), Anadolu University, Faculty of Education, Eskisehir, Turkey

Keywords:

eşik hipotezi, zekâ, yaratıcılık, hayal gücü

Abstract

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to examine the relation- ships between creative imagination and intelligence and to test the threshold hypothesis with younger students. The sample included 492 students aged 5-7 years. The Anadolu Sak Intelligence Scale was used to measure intelligence and Creative Imagination Cards were used to measure creativity. Firstly the re- lationship between intelligence and creative imagina- tion scores were analyzed, and then the correlation values of the lower and upper groups were com- pared. To determine the threshold at other IQ levels, different from 120 IQ, segmented regression analysis were performed. A weak relationship was found be- tween intelligence and creative imagination. The re- sults showed that the threshold theory was not sup- ported in younger children. Even, according to the segmented regression analysis, inverse threshold ef- fect was observed between creative imagination scores and general intelligence scores around 120 IQ. This is interpreted as the fact that in contrast to the threshold hypothesis, intelligence level above the 120 IQ, provides an advantage in the creative imagina- tion process for young age groups.

Key Words: threshold hypothesis, intelligence, crea- tivity, imagination

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı küçük yaş grubundaki öğrenci- lerde yaratıcı hayal gücü ve zekâ ilişkisinin incelen- mesi, eşik hipotezinin test edilmesidir. Çalışmada 5-7 yaş arası 492 öğrenci yer almıştır. Zekânın ölçü- münde Anadolu-Sak Zekâ Ölçeği; yaratıcılığın ölçü- münde Yaratıcı Hayal Gücü Kartları kullanılmıştır. Analiz aşamasında zekâ ve yaratıcı hayal gücü puan- ları arasındaki ilişkilere bakılmış; hipotezde belirtilen 120 IQ düzeyine göre alt ve üst grupların korelasyon değerleri karşılaştırılmıştır. Başka düzeylerde eşik değerin varlığını test etmek için ise parçalı regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Çalışmada zekâ ve yaratıcı hayal gücü arasında zayıf bir ilişki bulunmuş; küçük yaş gruplarında eşik hipotezi desteklenmemiştir. Hatta parçalı regresyon analizinde yaratıcılık endeksleri ile genel zekâ düzeyi arasında 120 IQ civarında ters bir eşik değer etkisi gözlenmiştir. Bu durum eşik hipote- zinin aksine küçük yaş gruplarında sahip olunan zekâ bileşenlerinin, 120 IQ’nun üzerine çıkıldıkça yaratıcı hayal gücü sürecine avantaj sağladığı şeklinde yorumlanmıştır.

 

References

Baddeley, A. D., & Andrade, J. (2000). Working memory and the vividness of imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(1), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.126

Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Jauk, E., & Benedek, M. (2014). The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory & cognition, 42(7), 1186-1197. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0428-8

Cho, S. H., Nijenhuis, J. T., Van Vianen, A. E., Kim, H. B., & Lee, K. H. (2010). The relationship between diverse components of intelligence and creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 44(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01329.x

Cicirelli, V. G. (1965). Form of the relationship between creativity, IQ, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56(6), 303-308. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022792

Daniels‐McGhee, S., & Davis, G. A. (1994). The imagery‐creativity connection. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 28(3), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1994.tb01189.x

Durndell, A. J., & Wetherick, N. E. (1976). The relation of reported imagery to cognitive perf mance. British Journal of Psychology, 67(4), 501-506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.20448295.1976.tb01538.x

Einstein, A. (1952) Letter to Jacque Hadamard. In B. Ghiselin (Ed.), The creative process (pp. 43-44). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Ferrando, M., Soto, G., Prieto, L., Sáinz, M., & Ferrándiz, C. (2016). Synthetic-creative intelligence and psychometric intelligence: Analysis of the threshold theory and creative process/sentetik-yaratici zeka ve psikometrik zeka: Esik kuramı ve yaratıcı süreç analizi. Türk Üstün Zekâ ve Egitim Dergisi, 6(2), 88-98.

Finke, R. A. (1996). Imagery, Creativity, and Emergent Structure. Consciousness and Cognition, 5(3), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1996.0024

Fuchs-Beauchamp, K. D., Karnes, M. B., & Johnson, L. J. (1993). Creativity and intelligence in preschoolers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(3), 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629303700303

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligence. New York: Basic Books

Glăveanu, V. P., Karwowski, M., Jankowska, D. M., & de Saint Laurent, C. (2017). Creative imagination. In T. Zittoun & V. P. Glăveanu (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and culture (pp. 1-39). Oxford University Press.

Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1960). Occupational choice and cognitive functioning: Career aspirations of highly intelligent and of highly creative adolescents. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61(1), 119-123. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045583

Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. New York: Wiley.

Gonzalez, M. A., Campos, A., & Pérez, M. J. (1997). Mental imagery and creative thinking. The Journal of psychology, 131(4), 357-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989709603521

Guilford, J. P. (1962). Potentiality for creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 6(3), 87-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698626200600307

Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00002.x

Gündoğan, A. (2019). The Test of Creative Imagination: making the test suitable to the age group of 5–6 years. Early Child Development and Care, 189(8), 1219-1227. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1372429

Hanggi, D. (1989). Differential aspects of visual short and long-term memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1(4), 285-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541448908403089

Hoffmann, J., & Russ, S. (2012). Pretend play, creativity, and emotion regulation in children. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026299

Holton, G. (1972). On trying to understand scientific genius. American Scholar, 41(1), 95-110. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41209034

Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912

Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41(4), 212-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.003

Karwowski, W., & Gralewski, J. (2013). Threshold hypothesis: Fact or artifact? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.05.003

Kaufman, J. C., Kaufman, S. B., & Lichtenberger, E. O. (2011). Finding creative potential on intelligence tests via divergent production. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 26(2), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573511406511

Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2-3), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-473

Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and mind. London: Harvard University Press. Lane, J. B. (1977). Problems in Assessment of Vividness and Control of Imagery. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45(2), 363–368. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1977.45.2.363

Lindqvist, G. (2003). Vygotsky's theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2), 245-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2003.9651416

Mourgues, C. V., Hein, T. M., Al-Harbi, S., Aljughaiman, A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2016). The relationship between analytical and creative cognitive skills from middle childhood to adolescence: Testing the threshold theory in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Learning and Individual Differences, 52(2016), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.05.005

Muggeo, V. M. (2008). Segmented: an R package to fit regression models with broken-line relationships. R news, 8(1), 20-25.

Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different?: Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.11.002

Policastro, E., & Gardner, H. (1999). From case studies to robust generalizations: An approach to the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 213-225). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Preckel, F., Holling, H., & Wiese, M. (2006). Relationship of intelligence and creativity in gifted and non-gifted students: An investigation of threshold theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(1), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.022

Ripple, R. E., & May , F. B. (1962). Caution in comparing creativity and IQ. Psychological Reports, 10(1), 229-230. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1962.10.1.229

Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1986). The threshold theory regarding creativity and intelligence: An empirical test with gifted and nongifted children. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 11(4), 212-218.

Şahin, F. (2014). Yaratıcılık–zeka ilişkisi: Yeni deliller. İlköğretim Online, 13(4), 1516-1530.

Sak, U. (2004). About creativity, giftedness, and teaching the creatively gifted in the classroom. Roeper Review, 26(4), 216-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190409554272

Sak, U. (2014a). Üstün zekâlılar: Özellikleri, tanılanmaları, eğitimleri. (4th ed.). Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık.

Sak, U. (2014b). Yaratıcılık gelişimi ve geliştirilmesi. Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık.

Shaw, G. A., & Belmore, S. M. (1982). The Relationship between Imagery and Creativity. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 2(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.2190/4RGA-Y1A6-HEK5-LMF8

Shaw, G. A. (1985). The use of imagery by intelligent and by creative schoolchildren. The Journal of General Psychology, 112(2), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1985.9711000

Shaw, G. A., & de Mers, S. T. (1987). Relationships between imagery and creativity in high-IQ children. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 6(3), 247-262. https://doi.org/10.2190/R18B-PUG2-4TBB-U4QP

Shi, B., Wang, L., Yang, J., Zhang, M., & Xu, L. (2017). Relationship between divergent thinking and intelligence: an empirical study of the Threshold Hypothesis with Chinese children. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(254), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00254

Singer, J. L. (1999). Imagination. In M. A. Runco, M. A. Pritzker, S. R. Pritzker, & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 13-25). California: Academic Press.

Sligh, A. C. (2003). The relation between intelligence and creativity in different intelligence levels. (Publication No. 3115075). [Doctoral dissertation, Alabama University]. https://search.proquest.com/docview/305334711?accountid=7181

Sligh, A. C., Conners, F. A., & Roskos‐Ewoldsen, B. (2005). Relation of creativity to fluid and crystallized intelligence. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01254.x

Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Nonentrenchment in the assessment of intellectual giftedness. In J. S. Renzulli (Eds.), Identification of students for gifted and talented programs (pp. 43-52). California: Corwin Press.

Snyder, A., Mitchell, J., Bossomaier, T., & Pallier, G. (2004). The creativity quotient: an objective scoring of ideational fluency. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 415-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410409534552

Şahin, F., (2014). Yaratıcılık–zeka ilişkisi: Yeni deliller, İlköğretim Online, 13(4), 1516-1530. Şahin, F. (2015). A Research on the structure of intelligence and creativity, and creativity style, Turkish Journal of Giftedness and Education, 5(1), 2-20

Tardif, T. Z., & Sternberg, R. J. (1988). What do we know about creativity?. The nature of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 429-438). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, W. L., Hsiao, Y., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2011). Dissociation between visual attention and visual mental imagery. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(2), 256-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.477810

Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Torrance, E. P. (1967). Understanding the fourth grade slump in creative thinking. Athens: University of Minnesota.

Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42(1), 7-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2004.11059210

Yamamoto, K. (1964). Threshold of intelligence in academic achievement of highly creative students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 32(4), 401-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1964.11010849

Yılmaz, G. (2018). Eşik hipotezinin Asis Zekâ Ölçeği puanları ve yaratıcı hayal gücü kartları ile incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilim- leri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir, Türkiye.

Yılmaz, G. and Ayas, M. B. (2017, July 3-5). Examination of threshold theory with a new measure of Intelligence. Paper presented at 15th Internatinal Conference on Excellence in Education (ICIE), sözlü bildiri, Lisboa, Portugual.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-20

How to Cite

Yılmaz, G., Ayas, M. B. ., & Sak, . U. . (2021). An Investigation of the Threshold Hypothesis Using ASIS Intelligence Scale and Creative Imagination Cards . TALENT, 10(2), 143–161. Retrieved from https://theeducationjournals.com/index.php/talent/article/view/86

Issue

Section

Research Article