The Effectiveness of Self-Regulated Learning on Teaching SCAMPER Technique of Creativity
Keywords:
öz-düzenleyici öğrenme, SCAMPER, yaratıcı düşünme, yaratıcılık, creative thinking, teaching creativityAbstract
Abstract
Researchers of current study hypothesized that self- regulated learning is a convenient tool to enhance cre- ativity since both serve to autonomous learning and self-actualization. In this respect, the aim of the study was to investigate the effect of self-regulated learning on enhancing creative thinking skills. An experi- mental design with a control group was used in this study. A total of 14 participants were assigned to re- ceive the experimental training. The same number of participants was assigned to the control group. A unique program developed by the researchers com- bined SCAMPER and self-regulated learning tech- nique was used in the experimental group. Only SCAMPER was used in the control group. The find- ings of the study revealed that self-regulated learning was effective to teach SCAMPER.
Öz
Mevcut araştırmada öz düzenleyici öğrenmenin, oto- nom bir düşünür olup kendini gerçekleştirmeye hiz- met etmesinden dolayı, yaratıcılığın arttırılması için uygun bir araç olduğu varsayılmaktadır. Bu bağ- lamda çalışmanın amacı, öz düzenleyici öğrenmenin yaratıcı düşünme becerilerini geliştirmedeki etkisini araştırmaktır ve temel araştırma sorusu şu şekildedir: Öz düzenleyici öğrenme, üniversite 2. Sınıf öğrencile- rinin SCAMPER etkinliğindeki puanlarının arttırıl- masında etkili midir? Bu çalışmada kontrol gruplu deneysel model kullanılmıştır. Deney ve kontrol grupları on dört öğrenciden oluşmuştur. Mevcut ça- lışma kapsamında araştırmacılar tarafından geliştiri- len ve SCAMPER ve öz düzenleyici öğrenme teknik- leri birleştiren bir program deney grubuna uygulan- mıştır. Kontrol grubunda sadece SCAMPER tekniği çalışılmıştır. Çalışmanın bulguları, öz düzenleyici öğ- renmenin, SCAMPER tekniğinin öğretilmesi için et- kili olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.
References
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Clifss, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Barak, M., & Mesika, P. (2007). Teaching methods for inventive problem-solving in junior high school. Thinking skills and creativity, 2(1), 19-29.
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2001). The tool of the mind: A case study of implementing the Vygotskian approach in American early childhood and primary classrooms. Geneva, Switzerland: UNESCO International Bureau of Education.
Craft, A. (2000). Creativity across the primary curriculum: framing and developing practice. London: Routledge.
Dacey, J. S. (1989). Fundamentals of creative thinking. Toronto: Lexington Books.
Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Press.
Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Press.
De Bono, E. (1992). Serious creativity. New York: Harper Collins.
De Bono, E. (2000). New thinking for the new millennium. Beverly Hills, California: New Millennium Press.
DeHaan, R. L. (2005). The impending revolution in undergraduate science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 253–270.
Diamond, A., Barnett, W. S., Thomas, J., & Munro, S. (2007). Preschool program improves cognitive control. Science, 318, 1387– 1388.
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58.
Felder, R. (1988). Creativity in engineering education. Chemical Engineering Education, 22(3), 120- 125.
Feldman, D. H., & Benjamin, A. C. (2006). Creativity and education: An american retrospective. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36, 319–336.
Feldhusen, J. F. ve Eng Goh, B. (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8(3), 231–244.
Feldhusen, J. F., & Treffinger, D. J. (1977). The role of instructional material in teaching creative thinking. Gifted Child Quarterly, 21(4), 450-459.
Freiman, V. (2009). Mathematical enrichment: Problem of the week model. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koich (Eds.), Creativity in Mathematics and the Education of Gifted Students (pp. 367-382). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Jackson, N., & Sinclair, C. (2006). Developing students' creativity: Searching for an appropriate pedagogying students' creativity: Searchin for an appropriate pedagogy. In N. Jackson, M. Oliver, M. Shaw, & J. Wisdom (Eds.), Developing creativity in higher education: An imaginative curriculum (pp. 118-142). USA, NY: Routledge.
Huang, T. (2009). Creativity training. In B. Kerr (Ed.), Encyclopedia of giftedness, creativity and talent (Vol. 1, pp. 219-221). London: SAGE Publications.
Kerr, B. (Ed.). (2009). Encyclopedia of giftedness, creativity and talent. California: Sage Publications.
Kessler, R. (2000). The soul of education: helping students find connection, compassion and character at school. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Kolloff, P., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1984). The effects of enrichment on self-concept and creative thinking. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 53-57.
Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20-48). New York: Cambridge Uni- versity Press.
Lan, W. Y. (1996). The effects of self-monitoring on students' course performance, use of learning strategies, attitude, self-Judgment ability, and knowledge representation. The Journal of Experimental Education 64(2), 101-115.
Linke, S. (2010). A new dynamic model of creativity. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.
Lubart, T.I., Besançon, M., & Barbot, B. (2011). Evaluation du potentiel créatif (EPoC): Test psy- chologique et manuel [Evaluation of creative potential: Test and manual]. Paris: Editions Hogrefe France.
MacKinnon, D.W. (1978). In search of human effectiveness. Buffalo: Creative Education Foundation.
Meissner, H. (1999, July). Creativity and mathematics education. Paper presented at the Creativity and Mathematics Education of the International Conference.
Nickerson, R. S. (2009). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg, Handbook of creativity. USA: Cam- bridge University Press.
Özyaprak, M. (2012). Üstün zekâlı ve yetenekli öğrencilere yönelik farklılaştırılmış matematik öğretiminin erişi, tutum ve yaratıcılığa etkisi [The effect of differentiated math curriculum for gifted and talented students on achievement, attitude and creativity]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Istanbul, İstanbul, Turkey .
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 92-104.
Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2009). Creativity productivity. In B. Kerr (Ed.), Encyclopedia of giftedness, creativity and talent (Vol. 1, pp. 194-197). London: SAGE Publications.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An Analysis of Creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310. Rose, L. H., & Lin, H. T. (1984). A meta-analysis of long-term creativity training programs. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 18(1), 11-22.
Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development and practice. San Diego, California: Elsevier Academic Press.
Sak, U. (2014). Yaratıcılık gelişimi ve geliştirilmesi [Development and enhancement of creativity]. Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık.
Sak, U., & Oz, O. (2010). The effectiveness of the creative reversal act (CREACT) on students’ creative thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(1), 33-39.
Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 71-86.
Schunk, D. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children's cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 359-382.
Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Dochy, F. (2009). The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self- regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 57-68.
Smith, J. K., & Smith, L. F. (2010). Educational creativity. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 250-264). Cambridge University Press: New York.
Sontag, C., & Stoeger, H. (2015). Can highly intelligent and high-achieving students benefit from training in self-regulated learning in a regular classroom context? Learning and Individual Differences, 41, 43-53.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). A triarchic view of giftedness: Theory and practice. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 43–53). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (2000). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 93–115). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., O’Hara, L. A., & Lubart, T. (1997). Creativity as investment. California Management Review, 40(1), 8 – 21.
Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity. Alexandria, VA: Asso- ciation of Supervision and Curriculum.
Stoeger, H. (2013). Learning as a creative process. In A. Tan (Ed.), Creativity, talent and excellence (pp. 3-13). Singapore: Springer.
Stoeger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2005). Evaluation of an elementary classroom self-regulated learning program for gifted math underachievers. International Education Journal, 6, 261-271.
Torrance, E. (1972). Can we teach children to think creatively?. The Journal of Creative Behav- ior, 6(2), 114-143.
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
Weinstein, C. E. (1978). Elaboration skills as a learning strategy. In H. G. O'Neil (Ed.), Learning strategies. New York: Academic Press.
Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D. (2000). Self-regulatiıon interventions with a focus on learning strategies. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Printrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self- regulation (pp. 816). Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
Weinstein, C. E., Ridley, D. S., Dahl, T., & Weber, E. S. (1989). Helping students develop strategies for effective learning. Educational Leadership, 46(4), 17-19.
Winne, P. H., and Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, M. Zeidner and P. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531-566). Orlando, FL: Academic.
Ziegler, A. (2014, November, 6). An interview with Prof.Dr. Albert Ziegler about gifted education. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 2 (2), 98-100.
Ziegler, A., Stoeger, H., & Vialle, W. (2013). Learning how to learn through homework: A six week training program for children in the middle primary years with sample mathematics content. Australia: Hawker Bronwlow Education.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary educational psychology, 11(4), 307-313.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulatin: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, M. Zeidner, & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement and self-efficacy. USA: American Psychological Association.
