Intelligence and Self-Control Predict Academic Performance of Gifted and Non-gifted Students

Authors

  • Omar M. Muammar Department of Special Education, Collage of Education, University of Damman, Saudi Arabia

Keywords:

zekâ, öz-kontrol, üstün zekâ, tanılama, akademik performans, intelligence, self-control, giftedness, identification, academic performance

Abstract

Abstract

The role of intelligence and self-control on aca- demic performance of academically gifted and non-gifted students was investigated. Intelli- gence was measured by the Cognitive Ability Test (CAT) which consisted of two subscales: verbal subtest and quantitative subtest. Self- control was assessed by observing the level of students’ commitments to submit their assign- ments and homework timely. The sample con- sisted of 74 freshmen- male students. Academi- cally gifted students were selected based on their academic performance as indicated by their GPA scores, the cut-off point was 3.50 out of 5.00. Intelligence and Self-control were en- tered a linear multiple regression model as in- dependent variables whereas students’ GPAs in the first semester was entered as the criterion variable. The results showed that both intelli- gence and self-control correlated significantly with GPA for the whole sample, r (74)=.31 and .58 respectively (p<.01). Intelligence and self- Control did not correlate significantly with each other. The results also showed that for the whole sample both intelligence and self-control accounted for 42% of the variance in students GPAs. For the gifted sample, both intelligence and self-control explained around 59% of the variance in the GPAs.

 

Öz

Bu çalışmada zekâ ve öz-kontrolün akademik olarak üstün zekâlı ve normal öğrencilerin aka- demik performanslarındaki rolü araştırılmıştır. Zekâ ölçümlerinde sözel ve sayısal olmak üzere iki alt testten oluşan Bilişsel Yetenek Testi (CAT) kullanılmıştır. Öz-kontrol ise öğrencile- rin ödevlerini ve görevlerini zamanında yapma davranışları gözlemlenerek değerlendirilmiştir. Üniversiteye devam eden 74 erkek birinci sınıf öğrencisi araştırmanın katılımcılarını oluştur- maktadır. Not ortalamaları 5 üzerinden 3,5’u geçen katılımcılar akademik üstün zekâlı olarak seçilmiştir. Zeka ve öz-kontrol puanları bağım- sız değişken, ilk dönem not ortalaması ise kri- ter değişkeni olarak kullanılarak çoklu doğru- sal regresyon modeli oluşturulmuştur. Bulgu- lara göre zeka ve öz-kontrol ile not ortalamaları arasında tüm örneklem için anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuş r(74)= .31 ve .58; p<.01, zeka ve öz- kontrol arasında ise anlamlı bir ilişki buluna- mamıştır. Tüm örneklem için zekâ ve öz-kont- rol notların %42’sini açıklarken, üstün zekâlı grupta bu oran %59 olarak bulunmuştur.

 

References

ACT. (2007). The role of nonacademic factors in college readiness and success. College Success. Alsaif, A. (2004). Predicting power of admission criteria at kfupm. King Saud University, Riyadh.

Baron, R. A., Byrne, D. E., & Baron, R. A. (2004). Social psychology: With research navigator (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.

Blanchard-Fields, F., Chen, Y., & Norris, L. (1997). Everyday problem solving across the adult life span: Influence of domain specificity and cognitive appraisal. Psychology and Aging, 12(4), 684-693.

Burger, J. M. (2004). Personality (6th ed.). Australia; Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth. Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). Common sense, intuition, and theory in personality and social psychology. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 8(2), 114-122.

Carraher, T., Carraher, D., & Schliemann, A. (1985). Mathematics in the streets and in the school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 21-29.

Ceci, S. (1996). On intelligence: A bioecological treatise on intellectual development (Expanded ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ceci, S., & Liker, J. (1986). Academic and nonacademic intelligence: An experimental separation. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in everyday world. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Dai, D. Y., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development. Mahwah, NJ; London: L. Erlbaum Associates.

Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). The psychology of problem solving. New York: Cam- bridge University Press.

Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gannon, N., & Ranzijn, R. (2005). Does emotional intelligence predict unique variance in life satisfaction beyond IQ and personality? Personality and Individual Differences, 38(6), 1353- 1364.

Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligences reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21th century. New York:

Basic Books.

Gottfredson, L. S. (2001). Practical intelligence in everyday life. Intelligence, 39(4), 363-365. Grigorenko, E. L., Meier, E., Lipka, J., Mohatt, G., Yanez, E., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). The relationship between academic and practical intelligence: A case study of the tacit knowledge of Native American Yup'ik people in Alaska. Learning & Individual Differ- ences, 14(4), 183-204.

Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Jaušovec, N. (1997). Differences in EEG activity during the solution of closed and open problems. Creativity Research Journal, 10(4), 317-324.

Kaia, L., Helle, P., & Ju ̈ ri, A. (2007). Personality and intelligence as predictors of academic achievement: A cross-sectional study from elementary to secondary school. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 441–451.

Kohn, M. L., & Schooler, C. (1983). Work and personality. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Liff, s. B. (2003). Social and emotional intelligence: Applications for developmental education.Journal of Developmental Education, 26(3), 27-34.

Lindner, R. W., & Harris, B. (1992, April, 1992). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement in college students. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.

Magno, C. (2008). Comparing models for generating a system of activation and inhibition of self-regulated learning. De La Salle University, Manila.

Maker, C. J., Rogers, J. A., Nielson, A. B., & Bauerle, P. R. (1996). Multiple intelligences, problem solving, and diversity in the general classroom. Journal for the Education of the Gifted,19(4), 437-460.

Myers, D. G. (2010). Psychology (9th ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.

Neisser, U. (1976). General, academic, and artificial intelligence. In L. Renich (Ed.), Human intelligence: Perspectives on its theory and measurement (pp. 179-189).

Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., & Cesi, S. J. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77-101.

Qiyas. (2011). Genral ability test: Student booklet. Riyadh: National Center for Assessment in Higher Education.

Renzulli, J. S. (1986). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, Conn.: Creative Learning Press.

Richardson, K. (2002). What IQ tests test. Theory & Psychology, 12(3), 283-315.

Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Davis, H. L. a. D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130(2), 261-288.

Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Peake, P. K. (1990). Predicting adolescent cognitive and self-regula-tory competencies from preschool delay of gratification: Identifying diagnostic condi-

tions. Developmental Psychology, 26(6), 978-986.

Shore, B. M., Cornell, D. G., Robinson, A., & Ward, V. S. (1991). Recommended practices in gifted

education: A critical analysis. New York: Teachers College Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Handbook of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press. Sternberg, R. J. (1984). A contextualist view of the nature of intelligence. International Journal of

Psychology, 19, 307-334.

Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence. New York: Viking. Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development. New York: Cambridge Uni-

versity Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Handbook of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press. Sternberg, R. J. (2003). International handbook of intelligence. NewYork: Cambridge University

Press.

Sternberg, R. J., & Detterman, D. K. (1979). Human intelligence: Perspectives on its theory and measurement. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Corp.

Sternberg, R. J., & Detterman, D. K. (1986). What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Corp.

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. (2002). The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? Mahwah, NJ; London: L. Erlbaum Associates.

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. (2003). The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise.Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. (2004a). Culture and competence: Contexts of life success (1st ed.).Washington; London: American Psychological Association.

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2004b). Successful intelligence in the classroom. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 274-280.

Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (1998). Human abilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 479-502.

Sternberg, R. J., Nokes, K., Geissler, P. W., Prince, R., Okatcha, F., Bundy, D., et al. (2001). The relationship between academic and practical intelligence: A case study in Kenya. Intelligence, 29(5), 401-418.

Sternberg, R. J., Okagaki, L., & Jackson, A. S. (1990). Practical intelligence for success in school. Educational Leadership, September.

Sternberg, R. J., & Ruzgis, P. (1994). Personality and intelligence. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1998). Intelligence, instruction, and assessment: Theory into practice. Mahway, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.

Stoeger, H. (2010). Self-regulated learning: As measure to support gifted achievers and under achievers in primary school, Scientific Symposium for Giftedness & Creativity. Alhassa,Saudi Arabia.

Stoeger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2005). Evaluation of an elementary classroom self-regulated learning program for gifted math underachievers. International Education Journal, 20, 261-271.

Zeidner, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Boekaerts, M. (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, Calif.;

London: Academic.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An over view.

Educational psychologist, 25, 3-17.

Published

2021-05-20

How to Cite

M. Muammar, O. . (2021). Intelligence and Self-Control Predict Academic Performance of Gifted and Non-gifted Students. TALENT, 5(1), 67–81. Retrieved from https://theeducationjournals.com/index.php/talent/article/view/36

Issue

Section

Research Article