Validity and Reliability Study of Questionnaire on Self-Regulated Learning -7 Turkish Version
Keywords:
öz düzenleyici öğrenme, ÖDÖÖ-7, Rasch analizi, üstün zekâlı ve yetenekli çocuklar, Self-regulated learning, SRL-7, Rasch analysis, gifted and talented studentsAbstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to make the Turkish adaption, and to evaluate the psychometric properties, of the Questionnaire on Self-Regulated Learning-7 (SRL-7). During the language adaptation process, 10 language specialists evaluated the adaptation indexes. In the language validation study, 41 lycée students completed both the English and Turkish forms of the questionnaire. To determine reliability and validity, 214 students were asked to participate. Results of reliability analysis of the sub-scales made with KR20 were .84 for self-regulated learning, .70 for unreflective/impulsive and .72 for external. A Rasch analysis intended to evaluate internal consistency showed acceptable infit, outfit and DIF. Finally, predictive validity analysis indicated positive correlation between self- regulated learning and both intrinsic motivation and achievement; unreflective/impulsive and external correlated positively with extrinsic motivation, and negatively with achievement. Thus, the Turkish version of SRL-7 is a valid and reliable measurement, which can be used in further studies.
Öz
Bu araştırmada Öz-Düzenleyici Öğrenme-7 Ölçeğinin (ÖDÖÖ-7) Türkçe dil uyumu, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmasının yapılması amaçlanmıştır. Dil uyumu aşamasında 10 uzmanla çalışılmış ve maddelerin uyum indeksleri belirlenmiştir. Tercüme işlemleri tamamlandıktan sonra, ölçeğin dil geçerliği için 41 lise öğrencisine (17 erkek, 24 kız) ölçeğin İngilizce ve Türkçe formları uygulanmıştır. Ölçeğin güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışmaları için toplamda 214 (108 erkek, 106 kız) 4. ve 7. sınıf öğrencisiyle çalışılmıştır. Profillerin güvenirliği KR20 formülü ile hesaplanmış ve öz-düzenleyici alt boyut .84, düşüncesiz-dürtüsel alt boyut .70 ve dıştan denetimli alt boyut .72 olarak saptanmıştır. İçsel yapı geçerliliği için yapılan Rasch analizi sonuçları iç uyum, dış uyum ve değişen madde fonksiyonlarının kabul edilebilir olduklarını; yordama geçerliği sonuçları ise ölçekteki profillerin motivasyon ve başarı arasındaki ilişkilerinin alan yazınla tutarlı olduğunu göstermiştir. Sonuç olarak ÖDÖÖ- 7'nin Türkçe formunun geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olduğu ve ileride üstün zekâlı ve yetenekli öğrencilerle yapılacak olan araştırmalarda kullanılabileceği düşünülmektedir.
References
Akkuş-İspir, O., Ay, Z. S., ve Saygı, E. (2011). Üstün başarılı öğrencilerin özdüzenleyici öğrenme stratejileri, matematiğe karşı motivasyonları ve düşünme stilleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(162), 235-246.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Clifss, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Boekaerts, M., Zeidner, M., & Printich, P. R. (2000). Handbook of self-regulated learning. Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah: NJ: Lawrebce Erlbaum.
Bouffard-Bouchard, T., Parent, S., & Larivee, S. (1993). Self-regulation on a concept-formation task among average and gifted students. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 115-134.
Camcı-Erdoğan, S., ve Leana-Taşcılar, M. Z. (2014). Üstün zekalı çocuklarda beklenmedik başarısızlık (underachievement) ve motivasyon sorunları. In N. Baykoç (Ed.), Akıl, zeka, deha, yetenek, dahiler-savantlar gelişimleri ve eğitimleri (pp. 215-240). Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık.
Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The road to expert performance: Empirical evidence from the arts and sciences, sports, and games. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ericsson, K. A. (2003). The acquisition of expert performance as problem solving: Construction and modification of mediating mechanisms through deliberate practice. In J. Davidson ve R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 31-84). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
Feldhusen, J. F. (2005). Giftedness, talent, expertise, and creative achievement. In R. J. Sternberg ve J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness
(pp. 64-79). UK: Cambridge.
Galton, F. (1865). Heredity talent and character. Macmillan's Magazine, 12, 157-166.
Glaser, R. (1996). Changing the agency for learning: Acquiring expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: The aquisition of expert performance in the arts, and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1-50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gobet, F. (2013). Expertise vs talent. Talent Development & Excellence, 5(1), 75-86.
Gökçe, E., Öztuna, D., & Elhan, H. A. (2011). Adaptation of Harter's scale of instrinsic versus extrinsic motivational orientation in the classroom to primary schools in turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 42, 79-94.
Gürsakal, N. (2001). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Bursa: Uludağ Üniversitesi Güçlendirme Vakfı Yayınları.
Hambrick, D. Z., Oswald, F. L., Altmann, E. M., & Meinz, E. J. (2014). Deliberate practice: Is that all it takes to become an expert? Intelligence, 45(1), 34-45.
Harter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology,17(3), 300-312.
İşçil, N. (1973). İstatistik metotları ve uygulamaları. Ankara: A.İ.T.İ.A Yayınları.
Kadıoğlu, C., Uzuntiryaki, E., ve Çapa-Aydın, Y. (2011). Özdüzenleyici öğrenme stratejileri ölçeğinin (öösö) geliştirilmsi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(60), 11-23.
Karasar, N. (1994). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Linacre, J. M. (2014). Winsteps rasch measurement computer program. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.
Manning, B. H., & Glasner, S. E. (1996). The self-regulated learning aspect of metacognition: A component of gifted education. Roeper Riview, 18(3), 217.
Meyer, P. J. (2014). Applied measurement with jmetrik. USA: New York: Routhledge.
Neber, H., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Sel-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemogical, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13(1), 59-74.
Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of researches on self-regulated learning. Educationa Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101.
Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. (1999). The differential impact of extrinsic and mastery goal orientations on males's and females' sekf regulated learning. Learning and individual differences, 11(2), 153-169.
Pintrich, P. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining sel-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.
Pintrich, P., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self regulated learnign components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
Pintrich, P., Smith, A., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning quetionnaire (mslq). Educational and Psychological Measurment, 53, 801-813.
Richman, H. B., Gobet, F., Staszewski, J. J., &Simon, H. A. (1996). Perceptual and memory processes in the acquisition of expert performance: The epam model. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence (pp. 167-187). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Risemberg, R., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1992). Self-regulated learning in gifted students. Roeper Review, 15(2), 98-101.
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 106(3), 435-457.
Simonton, D. K. (2001). Talent development as a multidimensional, multiplicative, and dynamic process. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(2), 39-43.
Sontag, C., Stoeger, H., & Harder, B. (2012). The relationship between intelligence and the preference for self-regulated learning: A longitudinal study with fourth-graders. Talent Development & Excellence, 4(1), 1-22.
Stoeger, H. (2013). Learning as a creative process. In A. Tan (Ed.), Creativity, talent and excellence (pp. 3-13). Singapore: Springer.
Stoeger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2005). Evaluation of an elementary classroom self-regulated learning program for gifted math underachievers. International Education Journal, 6, 261-271.
Valle, A., Nunez, J. C., Cabanach, R. G., Gozalez-Pienda, J. A., Rodriguez, S., Rosario, P. and et al. (2008). Self-regulated profiles and academic achievement. Psicothema, 20(4), 724-731.
Weinstein, C. E. (1978). Elaboration skills as a learning strategy. In H. G. O'Neil (Ed.), Learning strategies. New York: Academic Press.
Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Printich ve M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 816). Oxford: UK: Academic Press.
Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. . In M. Boekaerts, M. Zeidner ve P. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531-566). Orlando, FL:Academic.
Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: Mesa Press.
Yıldırım, A., ve Şimşek, M. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri Ankara: Seçkin
Yayıncılık.
Ziegler, A., Stoeger, H., & Vialle, W. (2013). Learning how to learn through homework: A six week training program for children in ht middle primary years with sample mathimatics content. Australia: Hawker Bronwlow Education.
Ziegler, A., Stoeger, H., Vialle, W., & Wimmer, B. (2012). Diagnosis of self-regulated learning profiles. Australian Journal of Gifted Education, 21(2), 62-74.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Development of self-regulated learning: Which are the key sub-processes? Contemproray Educational Psychology, 16, 307-313.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman ve D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1-25). New York: Springer.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990a). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990b). Self-regulating academic learning and achievement: The emergence of a social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 2(2), 173-201.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulatin: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, M. Zeidner ve P. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Development and adaptation of expertise: The role of self-regulatory processes and beliefs. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich ve R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington, DC: USA: American Psychological Association.
Zwick, R., & Ercikan, K. (1989). Analysis of differential item functioning in the naep history assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 55-66.
